Berlin Crossing is a novel by Kevin Brophy, an Irish writer who spent time
teaching in Germany in the period just after reunification and whose encounters
with disenchanted Ossies were the
inspiration for the novel. Most books
that deal with East Germany and the fall of the Wall are written from the point
of view of dissident East Germans or focus on the iniquities of the Communist
regime and the evil of the Wall. The received orthodoxy is that the
reunification of the two Germany's was a good thing for everyone other than
members and informants of the Stasi.
Brophy
approached the subject in from a different and refreshing perspective. His hero (or at least his focal point) is a
teacher and former Party member from Brandenburg in the east. Michael Ritter's life before reunification
had been successful and relatively privileged. Although not a member of the
security or political apparatus, he was a fully paid up believer in the system
and had been saddened at its collapse.
Reunification
has not been good for Michael, something which might help explain the curious
dislikeability of the character for much of the book. Dismissed from his job as an English teacher
for being politically suspect (I.e. a former member of the Party), he also
loses his mother shortly afterwards.
Worse is to follow. His mother's
dying words had been a request for him to find a pastor in another East German
town, Bad Saarow, and the mention of Roland, a man whose name was not that of
his father, who had died before Michael was born.
Having
nothing better to do and piqued by curiosity, Michael makes the trip to Bad
Saarow, which proves to be just the first step in a journey into the past both
of Michael's family and East Germany itself.
All of Michael's preconceptions are shattered as he is forced to
confront the fact that his beloved country was not the place he thought it had
been and Michael is not who he thought he was.
I was
sent a review copy of this by its publisher, Transworld, with a publicity blurb
that claimed that were echoes of le Carré. With due respect, and although the Cold War
setting and the spy story plot device has a flavour of le Carré, I think this comparison is a
little misleading. Le Carré's key themes are those of
deception and its dehumanising effects and the manipulations of governments and
their agencies. By contrast, Brophy's
characters are, almost without exception, honest, even if wrong, and the
deception that drives the plot is depicted as having been noble in its own way
rather than the corrosive kind of lying that permeates the world of Smiley.
Berlin Crossing is a novel of love, sacrifice and of awakening. I keep wanting to describe it as redemptive
in nature, due to Michael's realisation that he had been mistaken about the
true nature of the East German state.
This is not quite right though, as Michael has done nothing wrong
himself and therefore does not have anything to be redeemed for, unless you
count being on the losing side, or failing to celebrate the fall of the Wall,
as a sin.
The
structure of the book is interesting, incorporating a text within the text that
acts as a device to flip from the central plot to the sub-plot that underpins
the whole thing. It also allows for a
shift in time from post-Wall to the height of the Cold War. As well as the clever plotting and structuring, the
characterisation is strong and avoids falling into the trap of predictability
or stereotyping. With one or two
exceptions, the main characters show a mix of traits and motivations so they
come across as believable and human. I
particularly enjoyed the development of Terry Feldmann, brother of one of the
central characters.
I would
also say that Brophy's also creates a real sense of time and place, which is
critical for a story that cuts back and forth across the late 20th Century and
ranges across Europe.
Criticisms? Well, Brophy does have a bad habit of
insisting on translating even the shortest German phrase he uses, which slows
the story down and is a touch condescending.
Frankly, most of them were comprehensible even to this non-German
speaker and those that weren't didn't really add anything essential to the
story.
Secondly,
and more seriously, there is a certain credibility gap at one point in the
story. A random Irish-German student is
sent into East Berlin on a spy mission, despite having no training as a secret
agent. Although I can understand the
plot demanding this, it doesn't quite ring true. After all, the intelligence services couldn't
really be that short of German speakers, could they?
These
niggles notwithstanding, though, all in all, I found this an enjoyable ,
thought-provoking and evocative book which I would recommend, with the caveat
that one should not approach it as a spy novel but as a piece of general
fiction with some spy novel elements.
2 comments:
"The received orthodoxy is that the reunification of the two Germany's was a good thing for everyone other than members and informants of the Stasi."
Ever since I moved to Brussels I've been in contact with several Germans who also feel this is not quite right. What I wonder is how much of this is related to the immemorial feeling of "those good old days" (and also the current financial crisis?).
Alex - I suspect there's a bit of both involved in this and also maybe a feeling of being treated as second class by the Westerners.
Post a Comment